# 12-6-4 LJ types nonbonded model in metalloproteins

**URL:** https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019
**Category:** User discussions
**Tags:** forcefield
**Created:** [January 10, 2024, 5:01am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019 "2024-01-10T05:01:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mayank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/bc8723/32.png) [@mayank](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/mayank)
#### Post date: [January 10, 2024, 5:01am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/1 "2024-01-10T05:01:41Z")

</div>

Hi,

I have protein and ligand system with ZN+2 ion, but I am facing with stability of ligand and surrounding residues with zinc. I am using amber99sb-ildn.ff and ligand charges are produced using acpype gaff.

Recently I came accross a article in which they have talked about the highly charged metal ions parameterization using 12-6-4 LJ type nonbonded model.

Is it implementable in gromacs, if yes how it can be done.

Or is there other method through which I can resolve this problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![milosz.wieczor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b19c9b/32.png) [@milosz.wieczor](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/milosz.wieczor)
#### Post date: [January 10, 2024, 11:35am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/2 "2024-01-10T11:35:26Z")

</div>

It’s not yet included in Gromacs. Amber has it, and it can be done with OpenMM as well (if you read an Amber topology through Parmed). But I’m not sure if the Gromacs team is planning to implement it soon, perhaps Berk @hess can comment on that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hess](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/hess/32/416_2.png) [@hess](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/hess)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2024, 10:01am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/3 "2024-01-11T10:01:24Z")

</div>

The only way we would support at 12-6-4 non-bonded potential would be through user supplied tabulated functions (which could maybe also be generated by writing the math formula). But we have not reintroduced those yet.

If there is a limited, or fixed, list of atoms pairs involved in these interactions, you can use user tabulated bonded interactions for these pairs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![milosz.wieczor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b19c9b/32.png) [@milosz.wieczor](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/milosz.wieczor)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2024, 12:19pm UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/4 "2024-01-11T12:19:38Z")

</div>

Thanks, good to know for me as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f6c823/32.png) [@Harry](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/Harry)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2024, 1:29pm UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/5 "2024-01-11T13:29:12Z")

</div>

BS"D  
Martin Peters created a whole set of parameters for Zn bound to proteins:

Peters et al., (2010), Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 6, p. 2935-2947.

I have a modified amber99sb-ildn FF for 2 Cys, 2His systems. What are your ligands for the Zn atoms?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mayank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/bc8723/32.png) [@mayank](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/mayank)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2024, 1:55pm UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/6 "2024-01-11T13:55:59Z")

</div>

Thank you for your response, I ll look into it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mayank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/bc8723/32.png) [@mayank](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/mayank)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2024, 1:57pm UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/7 "2024-01-11T13:57:47Z")

</div>

I have 3 residues, HIS, ASP and GLU.  
The ligand has an imadazole ring which is interacting with zn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f6c823/32.png) [@Harry](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/Harry)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2024, 7:58am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/12-6-4-lj-types-nonbonded-model-in-metalloproteins/8019/8 "2024-01-15T07:58:38Z")

</div>

BS"D

I did that work quite some time ago, so I don’t remember all the details, but I did get two files from Martin that allowed me to use acpype to convert the necessary parameters into gromacs format, if you are interested. It was quite a lot of work to modify the force field, but the simulations were stable. Having the ligand as one of the Zn ligands makes things more complicated…
