# Drastic change in number of Water Molecules after Point Mutation

**URL:** <https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684>\
**Category:** User discussions\
**Tags:** analysis-tools\
**Created:** [June 26, 2023, 4:34am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684 "2023-06-26T04:34:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shivam1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@shivam1](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/shivam1)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 4:34am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/1 "2023-06-26T04:34:22Z")

</div>

GROMACS version:2022.2  
GROMACS modification: Yes/No  
Hi @jalemkul @hess @pjohansson

upon mutating 1 residue in the receptor (` **protein-protein system** `), the number of added water molecules have been changed drastically. (Provided all parameters are same ie box size, force field, sol type, mdp parameters, simulation time etc…)

mut\_1 =\> wild\_type to E484K → total SOL =\> 47997  
mut\_2 =\> wild\_type to N501Y → total SOL =\> 76428

I am not sure if the number of water molecules affects the **`mdrun`** performance but this made my system very slow almost by 0.5.  
For mut\_1 and mut\_2, it took 72 Hrs and 140 Hrs respectively to finish the MD simulation.

Two question:  
1st: Is it obvious/known phenomenon of Gromacs to change the number of water molecules abruptly upon mutation?  
2nd: Does the increased number of water molecules (SOL) makes the simulation slow as happned in my case?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shivam1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@shivam1](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/shivam1)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 5:47am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/2 "2023-06-28T05:47:11Z")

</div>

@jalemkul Please consider my query.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jalemkul](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/jalemkul/32/18_2.png) [@jalemkul](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/jalemkul)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 6:09am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/3 "2023-06-28T06:09:10Z")

</div>

A single point mutation would not result in such a drastic change. Your box size must be different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shivam1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@shivam1](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/shivam1)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 6:43am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/4 "2023-06-28T06:43:05Z")

</div>

Thanks for considering.  
I used the same script to generate topology. Don’t know what went wrong. I used the below command in the script to determine the box.

“gmx editconf -f test.gro -o test\_newbox.gro -c -d 1.2 -bt triclinic -box 1.2 1.2 1.2”

also, Does the number of water molecule affects the simulation speed i.e. time to finish the simulation?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jalemkul](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/jalemkul/32/18_2.png) [@jalemkul](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/jalemkul)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 6:58am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/5 "2023-06-28T06:58:09Z")

</div>

Check the box vectors in any coordinate file to check your work. But there’s no physical way that 30,000 more waters will fit in a box that was otherwise filled with a smaller number of waters.

The number of atoms in the system is principal determining factor in the speed of a simulation. More atoms means slower simulation (assuming everything else to be constant in terms of input settings and hardware).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shivam1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@shivam1](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/shivam1)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 8:12am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/6 "2023-06-28T08:12:24Z")

</div>

> [@jalemkul](#):
>
> The number of atoms in the system is principal determining factor in the speed of a simulation.

It means, number of Solvent molecules doesn’t affect the simulation speed, so there is something wrong with Gromacs may be it has crashed or having some trouble.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jalemkul](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/jalemkul/32/18_2.png) [@jalemkul](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/jalemkul)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2023, 8:27am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/7 "2023-06-28T08:27:42Z")

</div>

No. More solvent molecules = more atoms. Your second simulation is slower because it has far more atoms than the first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shivam1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@shivam1](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/shivam1)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2023, 12:41am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/drastic-change-in-number-of-water-molecules-after-point-mutation/6684/8 "2023-06-29T00:41:59Z")

</div>

Thanks :)
