# Gromacs installation on Fugaku ARM (A64FX) Node with Fujitsu MPI **URL:** \ **Category:** User discussions\ **Tags:** cmake-error, make-error\ **Created:** [May 15, 2026, 10:04am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461 "2026-05-15T10:04:34Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![noddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ac8455/32.png) [@noddy](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/noddy)\ **Post date:** [May 15, 2026, 10:04am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/1 "2026-05-15T10:04:34Z")
Hello everyone, I am trying to build GROMACS from source on Fugaku ARM (A64FX) compute nodes using the Fujitsu compiler and Fujitsu MPI environment available on the system. Current software environment: - Architecture: aarch64 (A64FX) - CPU Vendor: Fujitsu - System GCC: GCC 8.5.0 - Fujitsu Compiler: - Fujitsu MPI Library: 4.0.1 - CMake: 3.26.5 MPI environment currently detected: - mpirun / mpiexec using Fujitsu MPI Library 4.0.1 - MPI wrappers: Compiler observations: - GCC supports: - Fujitsu MPI wrappers (`mpifcc`, `mpiFCC`) internally report: - Fujitsu compiler also enters GNU compatibility mode during compilation. I am currently testing GROMACS 2019.x and 2020.x builds using: - Fujitsu MPI enabled build (`GMX_MPI=ON`) - ARM node compilation directly on Fugaku - GROMACS own built FFTW (`GMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON`) - ARM/A64FX optimization attempts During compilation, I observe warnings related to SIMD/vectorization handling such as: - `uxsimd sub-option specified in -K option is invalid` - `-Xg option is obsolete. GNU C/C++ compatible mode is active` and in some cases the Fujitsu compiler backend crashes internally during `make`. I would appreciate guidance regarding: - recommended stable GROMACS versions for Fugaku - recommended compiler flags for A64FX/FCC - whether SIMD/SVE should initially be disabled - whether GROMACS own FFTW is recommended on Fugaku - known compatibility limitations with recent GROMACS versions - any recommended patches or build procedures used internally on Fugaku systems Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. ---
**Author:** ![hess](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/hess/32/416_2.png) [@hess](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/hess)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 6:23am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/2 "2026-05-19T06:23:25Z")
Why use 7 and 6 year old versions?? I suggest using the lastest 2026 release, which has full support for A64FX. ---
**Author:** ![noddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ac8455/32.png) [@noddy](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/noddy)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 6:48am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/3 "2026-05-19T06:48:38Z")
Hi there! The reason I am using older version is because the compilers installed on the A64FX nodes are also older. As described in my post, the Fujitsu MPI Library is 4.0.1 which simulates gcc 6.1, and this version of gcc does not support gromacs flags like -DGMX\_SIMD=ARM\_SVE. Latest version of Gromacs won’t compile on these versions. ---
**Author:** ![hess](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/hess/32/416_2.png) [@hess](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/hess)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 6:56am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/4 "2026-05-19T06:56:12Z")
I didn’t read carefully enough. But version 2025.3 is installed on Fugaku. Why do you need something different? ---
**Author:** ![noddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ac8455/32.png) [@noddy](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/noddy)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 7:36am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/5 "2026-05-19T07:36:18Z")
For benchmarking purpose, I need to compile Gromacs from scratch so that I can get the benchmarking as per my optimization. ---
**Author:** ![hess](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/hess/32/416_2.png) [@hess](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/hess)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 7:40am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/6 "2026-05-19T07:40:33Z")
I still do not understand the purpose. Without ARM SVE you are not going to get good performance. ---
**Author:** ![noddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ac8455/32.png) [@noddy](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/noddy)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 7:43am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/7 "2026-05-19T07:43:51Z")
Ohk, but what about fujitsu mpi. Its causing me error during make. ---
**Author:** ![hess](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gromacs.bioexcel.eu/hess/32/416_2.png) [@hess](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/hess)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 7:53am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/8 "2026-05-19T07:53:17Z")
I don’t know how to compile GROMACS on Fugaku. You can check what the 2025.3 installation used by loading it and executing `gmx -version` ---
**Author:** ![noddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ac8455/32.png) [@noddy](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/u/noddy)\ **Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 8:24am UTC](https://gromacs.bioexcel.eu/t/gromacs-installation-on-fugaku-arm-a64fx-node-with-fujitsu-mpi/13461/9 "2026-05-19T08:24:33Z")
Yes, currently I am using their own gromacs using Spack. I am using benchPEP-h.tpr file as dataset. I want to test for 1/2/4/8/10 nodes with 48 processes and 1 omp thread for only 500 steps (yup 500 steps). Could you provide me better command, I am an IT person and not familiar with gromacs command. Those AI gives unnecessary flags in command. If possible, an entire PJM Script would be really grateful.