GROMACS version:
GROMACS modification: Yes/No
Hello everyone,
I am currently having difficulty understanding the correct topology/parameterization workflow for the metal nanocluster.
My system consists of a protein interacting with a metal nanocluster of approximately 6 nm diameter. I would like to use the INTERFACE Force Field (IFF) for the metal nanocluster.
Following a suggestion, I used the CHARMM-GUI Nanomaterial Modeler and selected GROMACS as the target MD engine. The generated GROMACS directory contains files such as:
step3_input.grostep3_input.pdbstep3_input.psftopol.toptoppar/NMA.itptoppar/forcefield.itptoppar/TIP3.itptoppar/SOD.itptoppar/CLA.itp
My main confusion is whether NMA.itp is already the topology for the generated nanocluster, with the required IFF parameters defined in forcefield.itp, or whether I need to combine information from these files to create a separate final metal.itp file.
I have also explored ACPYPE, but I understand that generating parameters through ACPYPE may not necessarily reproduce the INTERFACE Force Field parameterization that I want to use.
Could someone please clarify:
- Which of the CHARMM-GUI-generated files contains the actual topology of the Ag nanocluster?
- Are the atom types and non-bonded parameters already defined in the generated force-field files?
- Should
NMA.itpbe included directly intopol.toprather than creating another.itpfile? - What is the recommended procedure for integrating this IFF-based metal nanocluster topology with a CHARMM36 protein topology in GROMACS?
- Are there any additional steps required when using a larger nanocluster with IFF?
I would appreciate any guidance or examples from users who have worked with metal nanoparticles and the INTERFACE Force Field in GROMACS.
I can provide the relevant sections of NMA.itp, forcefield.itp, and topol.top if needed.
Thank you.